What a Criminal Defense Attorney Can Do

By adhering to the constitution and rules of proof, the criminal justice system seeks to clarify what a complex system can be. Often adhering to these laws has resulted in a miscarriage of justice with an innocent person being convicted or a guilty person going free, but for the majority of criminal cases it has been successful and until a new system is created, it is continuously being reworked and modified to succeed as much as possible. You would have a greater chance of a successful outcome in your case with the help of a criminal defence attorney. Get more info about Miranda Rights Law Firm HG Page.
Forensic science has done a lot to improve the criminal justice system and to make the criminal defence attorney ‘s job simpler, particularly if they have an innocent client who, based on circumstantial evidence, appears guilty. For years, several hopeful murderers have misinterpreted the Latin word “corpus delicti” to mean the victim’s actual body. The philosophy goes: no body, no crime. Corpus delicti, though, means the corpse of the crime, not the victim’s corpse, and there does not necessarily need to be a body to show that a murder has occurred. However, ample forensic proof must be present to show in reasonable doubt that the deceased is dead and that the accused is liable for that death.
However, most criminal defence lawyers would find it easier to battle a murder case against their clients if there is no body, so jurors still create a cloud of doubt. In reality, the recent Florida televised murder trial involving Casey Anthony was one where the prosecution did not expect to get a conviction without being discovered by the victim, Caylee Anthony, and the defence definitely hoped that the body would not be discovered to make their case of a strange abduction more believable.
And the suspects who confess to crimes they did not commit are contributing to the uncertainty of suing without the victim’s body. A suspect named Leonard Fraser, for example, confessed to murdering a young teenage girl in 2003 and was actually on trial for her murder and another murder, when the young teenager reappeared after being identified as a missing person for four years. Cases like this may be the rare exception, but these forms of reappearances of the allegedly “dead” victim generate doubt in a juror for a criminal defence attorney and that may be enough to escape a conviction.
However, for most suspects convicted of murder, forensics has progressed far enough to make it less likely that the body of a missing suspect will result in their innocence, but a good criminal defence attorney can still establish a solid argument against just circumstantial proof.